Root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus spp.) extraction from maize roots: a comparison of three methods

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30843/nzpp.2024.77.11782

Keywords:

Endoparasitic nematode, microscopic observation, morphology, centrifugal-sugar flotation, Baermann funnel, Whitehead & Hemming tray

Abstract

This study examines differences in extraction efficiency of three methods for extracting root-lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.) from maize roots. The Baermann funnel, Whitehead & Hemming tray, and centrifugal-sugar flotation methods were evaluated for efficiency and clarity using microscopic observation. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences among the methods. The centrifugal-sugar flotation method yielded the highest nematode count (1874±76 per 5 g of roots) but the clarity of the observation field under the microscope was lower due to root residues compared to the other two tested methods. The Baermann funnel method yielded 35.9% extraction efficiency (672±46 per 5 g of roots) compared to the centrifugal-sugar flotation method with higher clarity of the observation field than other tested methods. The Whitehead & Hemming tray presented a moderate level of observation field clarity compared to other tested methods with a nematode extraction efficiency of 60.8% (1140±53 per 5 g of roots) compared to the centrifugal-sugar flotation method. The results suggest that the Whitehead & Hemming tray could be a viable choice for nematode extraction, especially when both nematode numbers and microscopic clarity are important considerations. Understanding the restrictions of each methodology enhances the accuracy of nematode quantification leading to improved and updated data for maize producers in New Zealand.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-26

How to Cite

[1]
Thiruchchelvan, N. , Casonato, S. , Moukarzel, R. , Condron, L. and Kularathna, M. 2024. Root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus spp.) extraction from maize roots: a comparison of three methods. New Zealand Plant Protection. 77, (Jun. 2024), 36–42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30843/nzpp.2024.77.11782.

Issue

Section

Papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)