Comparing traditional methods of test species selection with the PRONTI tool for host-range testing of Eadya daenerys (Braconidae)
A computer-based tool (PRONTI; Priority Ranking Of Non-Target Invertebrates) has been developed to assist the selection of invertebrate species for risk-assessment testing with entomophagous biological control agents (BCAs). PRONTI was used to produce a prioritised list of taxa for host-range testing with the braconid parasitoid Eadya daenerys, a potential BCA for the eucalypt pest, Paropsis charybdis. The resulting list was compared with a list developed using traditional species selection methods. Seven of the nine species on the traditional list were in the PRONTI top 20. The remaining two species (Agasicles hygrophila and Cassida rubiginosa) may not have been selected if the PRONTI tool had been used. These two species were on the traditional list because they are in the same family as the target and are considered valuable BCAs. Alternative BCAs were prioritised by PRONTI. The other 13 taxa prioritised by PRONTI were not on the traditional list: the taxa are little-known natives in the target subfamily or sister subfamily but larvae are presumed to be root-feeders, whereas target larvae are leaf-feeders. PRONTI can support the traditional approach by providing transparent evidence to support the selection (or rejection) of non-target species for host-range testing.
Barratt BIP, Todd JH, Malone LA 2016. Selecting non-target species for arthropod biological control agent host range testing: evaluation of a novel method. Biological Control 93: 84–92. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.11.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.11.012</a>
de Little DW 1979. A preliminary review of the genus <em>Paropsis </em>Olivier (<em>Coleoptera</em>: <em>Chrysomelidae</em>) in Tasmania. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 18: 91–107. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.1979.tb00819.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.1979.tb00819.x</a>
Gourlay AH, Fowler SV, Rattray G 2005. Abundance of ragwort flea beetle (<em>Longitarsus jacobaeae</em>) at five sites on the west coast, South Island, New Zealand. In LC0405/131 ed. Manaaki Whenua, Landcare Research.
Hoddle MS 2004. Chapter 4. Analysis of fauna in the receiving area for the purpose of identifying native species that exotic natural enemies may potentially attack. In: Van Driesche RG, Reardon R ed. Assessing host ranges for parasitoids and predators used for classical biological control: a guide to best practice. USDA Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia. Pp. 24–39.
Kuhlmann U, Schaffner U, Mason PG 2006. Selection of non-target species for host specificity testing. In: Bigler F, Babendreier D, Kuhlmann U ed. Environmental impact of invertebrates for biological control of arthropods. CABI International, Wallingford, UK. Pp. 15–37. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990583.0015">https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990583.0015</a>
Manners AG, Palmer WA, Dhileepan K, Hastwell GT, Walter GH 2010. Characterising insect plant host relationships facilitates understanding multiple host use. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 4: 7–17. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-009-9079-2">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-009-9079-2</a>
Nahrung HF, Allen GR 2004. Sexual selection under scramble competition: mate location and mate choice in the eucalypt leaf beetle <em>Chrysophtharta agricola</em> (Chapuis) in the field. Journal of Insect Behavior 17: 353–366. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIR.0000031536.59988.0d">https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIR.0000031536.59988.0d</a>
Paynter QE, Fowler SV, Gourlay AH, Haines ML, Harman HM, Hona SR, Peterson PG, Smith LA, Wilson-Davey JRA, Winks CJ, Withers TM 2004. Safety in New Zealand weed biocontrol: a nationwide survey for impacts on non-target plants. New Zealand Plant Protection 57: 102–107.
Peixoto L, Allen GR, Ridenbaugh RD, Quarrell SR, Withers TM, Sharanowski BJ 2018. When taxonomy and biological control researchers unite: species delimitation of Eadya parasitoids (<em>Braconidae</em>) and consequences for classical biological control of invasive paropsine pests of Eucalyptus. PLoS ONE in press.
Reid CAM 2006. A taxonomic revision of the Australian <em>Chrysomelinae</em>, with a key to the genera (<em>Coleoptera</em>: <em>Chrysomelidae</em>). Zootaxa 1292: 1–119.
Reid CAM 2014. Chrysomeloidea Latreille, 1802. In: Leschen RAB, Beutel RG ed. Handbook of Zoology, Vol IV (<em>Arthropoda</em>: <em>Insecta</em>), Part 38 Coleoptera, Beetles. Morphology and Systematics. De Gruyter, Berlin. Pp. 11–16.
Rice AD 2005. The parasitoid guild of larvae of <em>Chrysophtharta agricola</em> Chapuis (<em>Coleoptera</em>: <em>Chrysomelidae</em>) in Tasmania, with notes on biology and a description of a new genus and species of tachinid fly. Australian Journal of Entomology 44: 400–408. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.2005.00489.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.2005.00489.x</a>
Ridenbaugh RD, Barbeau E, Sharanowski BJ 2018. Descriptiom of four new species of Eadya (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) parasitoids of the Eucalyptus tortoise beetle (<em>Paropsis charybdis</em>) and other Eucalyptus defoliating leaf beetles. Journal of Hymenoptera Research (In press). <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.@@.24282">https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.@@.24282</a>.
Stewart CA, Chapman RB, Emberson RM, Syrett P, Frampton CMA 1999. The effect of temperature on the development and survival of <em>Agasicles hygrophila</em> Selman & Vogt (<em>Coleoptera</em>: <em>Chrysomelidae</em>), a biological control agent for alligator weed (<em>Alternanthera philoxeroides</em>). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 26: 11–20. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1999.9518172">https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1999.9518172</a>
Todd JH, Barratt BIP, Tooman L, Beggs J, Malone LA 2015. Selecting non-target species for risk assessment of entomophagous biological control agents: evaluation of the PRONTI decision-support tool. Biological Control 80: 77–88. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.09.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.09.014</a>
Todd JH, Barratt B, Withers TM, Berndt LA, Gresham BA, Avila GA, Malone LA 2016. A comparison of methods for selecting non-target species for risk assessment of the biological control agent <em>Cotesia urabae</em> BioControl 62: 39–52. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9770-z">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9770-z</a>
Withers TM, Allen GR, Reid CAM 2015. Selecting potential non-target species for host range testing of <em>Eadya paropsidis</em>. New Zealand Plant Protection 68: 179–186.