Detached shoot treatments cannot replace whole-tree assays when phenotyping for apple resistance to Neonectria ditissima
Abstract
To develop a fast phenotyping method for European canker resistance of apple, detached-shoot assays were compared with whole-tree phenotyping methods. Disease incidence and lesion length in detached shoots and potted trees of six apple accessions were compared after inoculation with Neonectria ditissima conidia in a glasshouse. Detached shoots were placed in aerated water or in a Chrysal solution, with and without water changes. ‘Royal Gala’ trees had the highest disease incidence (90%) and ‘Robusta 5’ trees remained lesion-free. The treatment-accession interaction effect was significant, with higher disease incidence in detached shoots of ‘Robusta 5’ (4—32%) than ‘Braeburn’ (0—2%), while ‘Braeburn’ trees had a high disease incidence (64%). ‘Robusta 5’ had smaller lesions than the other accessions, but significant differences between accessions were observed on only one of three assessment dates. None of the detached-shoot assays resulted in a similar ranking of the accessions compared with the potted-tree assay, using disease incidence or lesion length. Detached-shoot treatments cannot replace whole-tree assays when phenotyping for European canker resistance of apple.
References
Bus V, Singla G, Ward S, Brewer L, Morgan C, Bowatte D, Bassett H, Attfield B, Colhoun K, Bastiaanse H, Walter M, Scheper R, Fisher B, Won K, Montanari S, Volz R, Chagné D, Gardiner SE 2017. Progress in pipfruit resistance breeding and research at Plant & Food Research. Acta Horticulturae 1172: 7-14. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1172.2
Garkava-Gustavsson L, Ghasemkhani M, Zborowska A, Englund JE, Lateur M, Van de Weg E 2016. Approaches for evaluation of resistance to European canker (Neonectria ditissima) in apple. Acta Horticulturae 1127: 75-81. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1127.14
Garkava-Gustavsson L, Zborowska A, Sehic J, Rur M, Nybom H, Englund JE, Lateur M, Van der Weg E, Holefors A 2013. Screening of apple cultivars for resistance to European canker, Neonectria ditissima. Acta Horticulturae 976: 529-536. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.976.75
Ghasemkhani M, Liljeroth E, Sehic J, Zborowska A, Nybom H 2015a. Cut-off shoots method for estimation of partial resistance in apple cultivars to fruit tree canker caused by Neonectria ditissima. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science 65: 412-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2015.1016101
Ghasemkhani M, Sehic J, Ahmadi-Afzadi M, Nybom H, Garkava-Gustavsson L 2015b. Screening for partial resistance to fruit tree canker in apple cultivars. Acta Horticulturae 1099: 687-690. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1099.84
Gómez-Cortecero A, Saville RJ, Scheper RWA, Bowen JK, De Medeiros HA, Kingsnorth J, Xu XM, Harrison RJ 2016. Variation in host and pathogen in the Neonectria/Malus interaction; toward an understanding of the genetic basis of resistance to European canker. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 1365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01365
Scheper RWA, Fisher BM, Amponsah NT, Walter M 2014. Effect of culture medium, light and air circulation on sporulation of Neonectria ditissima. New Zealand Plant Protection 67: 123-132.
Scheper RWA, Frijters L, Fisher BM, Hedderley DI 2015. Effect of freezing of Neonectria ditissima inoculum on its pathogenicity. New Zealand Plant Protection 68: 257-263.
Swinburne TR 1975. European canker of apple (Nectria galligena). Review of Plant Pathology 54: 787-799.
Van de Weg WE 1989. Screening for resistance to Nectria galligena Bres. in cut shoots of apple. Euphytica 42: 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034459
Weber RWS 2014. Biology and control of the apple canker fungus Neonectria ditissima (syn. N. galligena) from a Northwestern European perspective. Erwerbs-Obstbau 56: 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-014-0210-x
Zeller SM 1926. European canker of pomaceous fruit trees. Oregon Agricultural College Experimental Station Bulletin 222: 1-52.
